AKA ERNIE 11:20 Mon Apr 17
Randolph to stay in goal
|
|
Reading slavs interview about him sounds like he wont be dropped next saturday
What the fuck has he got to do to be dropped then hes been fucking shit for a few games now.
Did slav catch adrian shagging his wife ?
|
|
|
Replies - Newest Posts First ( Show In Chronological Order)
Willtell
10:16 Tue Apr 18
Re: Randolph to stay in goal
|
Ag ag ag! Johnson you'll be telling us how much you really love the board next.
|
HairyHammer
10:15 Tue Apr 18
Re: Randolph to stay in goal
|
If he stays, I go !!!.
Naaaaaaaaaaaaaa !
|
Johnson
10:09 Tue Apr 18
Re: Randolph to stay in goal
|
Your prejudices are your own Willtell.
|
Willtell
10:00 Tue Apr 18
Re: Randolph to stay in goal
|
Johnson 9:22
I really don't think Bilic says anything because he has to. He even said publicly that our training "lacked intensity" once and jumped on a table when Payet scored in the Euros.
1. Bilic could easily have said "He's a player any club would be interested in if he becomes available but we will look at that in the summer..."
2. Really? Saying he might be interested in a new keeper in the summer would be a concern? I sincerely doubt it. It might even have motivated them.
Very obvious I would have thought.
Claiming there is nothing anti-board in your post? It is full of innuendo and in-line with your anti-board campaign but yes I suppose there was nothing that actually said the board are shit. Does it need to spell that out to be classed as anti-board? I don't think so...
|
BigLump
9:58 Tue Apr 18
Re: Randolph to stay in goal
|
Bilic is now in no mans land. If he plays Randolph and he makes another error, he'll get coated.
If he plays Adrian instead, he'll get coated for dropping Randolph and damaging his confidence, and possibly losing some respect from the team in general.
In my opinion, change seems inevitable. He cant play Randolph after the weekend. If I was Koeman I'd be firing crosses from the first whilst in all day at him and sooner or later he'll drop one.
|
Sir Alf
9:54 Tue Apr 18
Re: Randolph to stay in goal
|
I think he must be a vampire? Terrified of crosses?
*** Gets coat ***
|
lincshammer
9:52 Tue Apr 18
Re: Randolph to stay in goal
|
I might be wrong but I think the last time we paid a fee for a keeper was Green and that must be over a decade ago now. He had his faults but he was head on shoulders above what we've had since. We've had that old cunt Jussi on a free and the two clowns we have currently.
|
Justin P
9:40 Tue Apr 18
Re: Randolph to stay in goal
|
What would Bilic say if somebody asked him directly why he won't bring Adrian back in to replace a currently poor Randolph when Adrian did far less in terms of clangers and form when he got dropped??????
|
Johnson
9:22 Tue Apr 18
Re: Randolph to stay in goal
|
A manager kind of has to say that doesn't he? For two reasons;
1. Avoiding being accused of tapping up
2. Avoiding further pissing off two seemingly out of form goalkeepers
Pretty obvious I would have thought.
There was nothing anti-board in my post, that was what happened. You've interpreted as anti-board most probably because you know a club like ours shouldn't be scrabbling about the bargain bin for players so see it as a negative thing.
|
Willtell
9:07 Tue Apr 18
Re: Randolph to stay in goal
|
Not like you to be anti the board Johnson...
As it happens I think you might well be right about the signing but, Bilic recently dismissed our reported interest in Joe Hart saying something like "We aren't interested in Hart as we have two fantastic keepers..."
|
Rossal
9:06 Tue Apr 18
Re: Randolph to stay in goal
|
How can't he be dropped after recent weeks. Adrian was dropped for less.
Yet again Slav making the wrong call and making himself look inept.
Lovely guy....shit decision making as a mangaer...its a recurring theme
|
Johnson
8:57 Tue Apr 18
Re: Randolph to stay in goal
|
When you say we, you mean the post immediately before yours? Why not just address him directly?
Randolph WAS a Sullivan signing to be fair to SS, we didn't even have a manager when he was bought in I don't think. For free. From a below average Championship side. That the board used to own.
I doubt Sullivan is forcing him to start though.
|
Willtell
8:41 Tue Apr 18
Re: Randolph to stay in goal
|
So now we're blaming the board for a manager's choice of keeper are we?
|
SilverSurfer
1:18 Tue Apr 18
Re: Randolph to stay in goal
|
What the fvck can Slav see that I can't?
What the fvck can Slav see everyone else can't?
Is it the Disease that has always haunted us where the board decides, and the manager has fuck all say in any matter?
|
mike hunt
1:14 Tue Apr 18
Re: Randolph to stay in goal
|
fucking madness
|
jfk
12:49 Tue Apr 18
Re: Randolph to stay in goal
|
Mad Dog 12:40 Tue Apr 18
|
bruuuno
12:47 Tue Apr 18
Re: Randolph to stay in goal
|
I'd take gandalph right now
|
Mad Dog
12:40 Tue Apr 18
Re: Randolph to stay in goal
|
Well said wd40
|
wd40
12:15 Tue Apr 18
Re: Randolph to stay in goal
|
Adrian gives a shit and shows his passion
Randolph doesn't
Both just average but give me someone who shows passion in a WHU shirt anytime over someone who has never.
|
fraser
11:49 Mon Apr 17
Re: Randolph to stay in goal
|
Randolph is shit, he shouldn't be anywhere near a PL team. Looks petrified and clueless every time a high ball comes in, shit positioning and weak even if he does get there.
|
David L
11:44 Mon Apr 17
Re: Randolph to stay in goal
|
Sniper 9.12
I wouldnt want to save a shit for four months either.
Imagine that.
|
| 
